VendorsGoogleandroidall versions
Vulnerabilities

Google Android

Ranked by severity, then by exploit likelihood. Click a CVE ID for its full record.

9603CVEs
CVE-2023-21003
In getAvailabilityStatus of several Transcode Permission Controllers, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-261193711
Published 2023-03-24 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48368
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48244
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48245
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48369
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48249
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48250
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-23710
In assertPackageWithSharedUserIdIsPrivileged of InstallPackageHelper.java, there is a possible execution of arbitrary app code as a privileged app due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2024-05-07 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2023-21257
In updateSettingsInternalLI of InstallPackageHelper.java, there is a possible way to sideload an app in the work profile due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2023-07-12 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2023-21068
In (TBD) of (TBD), there is a possible way to boot with a hidden debug policy due to a missing warning to the user. This could lead to local escalation of privilege after preparing the device, hiding the warning, and passing the phone to a new user, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android kernelAndroid ID: A-243433344References: N/A
Published 2023-03-24 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48388
In powerEx service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-32906
In AcvpOnMessage of avcp.cpp, there is a possible EOP due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2024-06-13 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-53841
In startListeningForDeviceStateChanges, there is a possible Permission Bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-01-03 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48243
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48246
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2023-21004
In getAvailabilityStatus of several Transcode Permission Controllers, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-261193664
Published 2023-03-24 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-44433
In phoneEx service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2023-21005
In getAvailabilityStatus of several Transcode Permission Controllers, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-261193946
Published 2023-03-24 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48248
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2018-9366
In IMSA_Recv_Thread and VT_IMCB_Thread of ImsaClient.cpp and VideoTelephony.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2024-11-19 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2018-9367
In FT_ACDK_CCT_V2_OP_ISP_SET_TUNING_PARAS of Meta_CCAP_Para.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2024-11-19 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2018-9372
In cmd_flash_mmc_sparse_img of dl_commands.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to a local escalation of privilege in the bootloader with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2024-11-19 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2022-48247
In audio service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges.
Published 2023-05-09 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2023-21128
In various functions of AppStandbyController.java, there is a possible way to break manageability scenarios due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-272042183
Published 2023-06-15 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2023-21015
In getAvailabilityStatus of several Transcode Permission Controllers, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-244569778
Published 2023-03-24 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20780
In display, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10184061; Issue ID: MSV-4712.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2023-21131
In checkKeyIntentParceledCorrectly() of ActivityManagerService.java, there is a possible bypass of Parcel Mismatch mitigations due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and the ability to launch arbitrary activities in settings with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-265015796
Published 2023-06-15 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2018-9477
In the development options section of the Settings app, there is a possible authentication bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2024-11-20 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2023-21175
In onCreate of DataUsageSummary.java, there is a possible method for a guest user to enable or disable mobile data due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-262243574
Published 2023-06-28 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26431
In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java, there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28607
In multiple functions in multiple locations, there is a possible background activity launch bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28631
In buildMiniResolver of IntentForwarderActivity.java, there is a possible consent bypass due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28663
In buildIntentSenderForUser of LauncherAppsService.java, there is a possible way to launch an activity from the background due to BAL Bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26436
In clearAllowBgActivityStarts of PendingIntentRecord.java, there is a possible way for an application to launch an activity from the background due to BAL Bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28636
In setupLayout of PickActivity.java, there is a possible bypass of the "Install unknown apps" security restriction due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28644
In startNextMatchingActivity of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2023-21328
In Package Installer, there is a possible way to determine whether an app is installed, without query permissions, due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2023-10-30 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-22012
there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2024-02-07 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20645
In KeyInstall, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09475476; Issue ID: MSV-2599.
Published 2025-03-03 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-49887
In maybeRemoveInvalidInstallerPackageName of InstallRepository.kt, there is a possible unauthorized app update due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
← Prev103 / 241Next →