Tenda w20e 4.0

An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Failure to validate the value of `usbPartitionName`, which is directly used in `doSystemCmd`, may lead to critical command injection vulnerabilities.

An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Failure to validate the sizes of `gstup` and `gstdwn` before concatenating them into `gstruleQos` may lead to buffer overflow.

An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Attackers may exploit the vulnerability by controlling the value of `nptr`. When this value is passed into the `getMibPrefix` function and concatenated using `sprintf` without proper size validation, it could lead to a buffer overflow vulnerability.

An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Attackers may exploit the vulnerability by controlling the value of `picName`. When this value is used in `sprintf` without validating variable sizes, it could lead to a buffer overflow vulnerability.

An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Attackers may exploit the vulnerability by specifying the value of `userInfo`. When `userInfo` is passed into the `addAuthUser` function and processed by `sscanf` without size validation, it could lead to buffer overflow.

An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Attackers may exploit the vulnerability by controlling the value of `nptr`. When this value is passed into the `getMibPrefix` function and concatenated using `sprintf` without proper size validation, it could lead to a buffer overflow vulnerability.

An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Failure to validate `pPortMapIndex` may lead to buffer overflows when using `strcpy`.

An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Attackers may exploit the vulnerability by specifying the value of `userInfo`. When `userInfo` is passed into the `addWewifiWhiteUser` function and processed by `sscanf` without size validation, it could lead to a buffer overflow vulnerability.

An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Attackers may send overly long `addDhcpRules` data. When these rules enter the `addDhcpRule` function and are processed by `ret = sscanf(pRule, " %d\t%[^\t]\t%[^\n\r\t]", &dhcpsIndex, dhcpsIP, dhcpsMac);`, the lack of size validation for the rules could lead to buffer overflows in `dhcpsIndex`, `dhcpsIP`, and `dhcpsMac`.