VendorsaxTLS Projectaxtlsany version
Vulnerabilities

axTLS Project axTLS any version

Ranked by severity, then by exploit likelihood. Click a CVE ID for its full record.

6CVEs
CVE-2019-8981
tls1.c in Cameron Hamilton-Rich axTLS before 2.1.5 has a Buffer Overflow via a crafted sequence of TLS packets because the need_bytes value is mismanaged.
Published 2019-03-26 · Modified
9.8EPSS 0.027
CVE-2019-10013
The asn1_signature function in asn1.c in Cameron Hamilton-Rich axTLS through 2.1.5 has a Buffer Overflow that allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) via a crafted certificate in the TLS certificate handshake message, because the result of get_asn1_length() is not checked for a minimum or maximum size.
Published 2019-12-03 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.019
CVE-2019-9689
process_certificate in tls1.c in Cameron Hamilton-Rich axTLS through 2.1.5 has a Buffer Overflow via a crafted TLS certificate handshake message with zero certificates.
Published 2019-12-03 · Modified
7.5EPSS 0.015
CVE-2018-16149
In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification blindly trusts the declared lengths in the ASN.1 structure. Consequently, when small public exponents are being used, a remote attacker can generate purposefully crafted signatures (and put them on X.509 certificates) to induce illegal memory access and crash the verifier.
Published 2018-11-07 · Modified
5.9EPSS 0.007
CVE-2018-16253
In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification does not properly verify the ASN.1 metadata. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509 certificates. This is an even more permissive variant of CVE-2006-4790 and CVE-2014-1568.
Published 2018-11-07 · Modified
5.9EPSS 0.006
CVE-2018-16150
In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification does not reject excess data after the hash value. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509 certificates. This is a variant of CVE-2006-4340.
Published 2018-11-07 · Modified
5.9EPSS 0.006