VendorsBouncy Castlebc-javaall versions
Vulnerabilities

Bouncy Castle Bouncycastle BC-java

Ranked by severity, then by exploit likelihood. Click a CVE ID for its full record.

52CVEs
CVE-2026-59647
CRMF/CMP password-MAC honours unbounded iteration count
Published 2026-08-03 · Analyzed
6.9EPSS 0.004
CVE-2026-59648
OpenPGP Argon2 S2K honours attacker-chosen memory and passes
Published 2026-08-03 · Analyzed
6.9EPSS 0.004
CVE-2026-59652
LDAP filter injection in legacy jdk1.4 LDAPStoreHelper
Published 2026-08-03 · Analyzed
6.9EPSS 0.003
CVE-2016-1000345
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES/ECIES CBC mode vulnerable to padding oracle attack. For BC 1.55 and older, in an environment where timings can be easily observed, it is possible with enough observations to identify when the decryption is failing due to padding.
Published 2018-06-04 · Modified
5.9EPSS 0.026
CVE-2016-1000341
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier DSA signature generation is vulnerable to timing attack. Where timings can be closely observed for the generation of signatures, the lack of blinding in 1.55, or earlier, may allow an attacker to gain information about the signature's k value and ultimately the private value as well.
Published 2018-06-04 · Modified
5.9EPSS 0.026
CVE-2016-2427
The AES-GCM specification in RFC 5084, as used in Android 5.x and 6.x, recommends 12 octets for the aes-ICVlen parameter field, which might make it easier for attackers to defeat a cryptographic protection mechanism and discover an authentication key via a crafted application, aka internal bug 26234568. NOTE: The vendor disputes the existence of this potential issue in Android, stating "This CVE was raised in error: it referred to the authentication tag size in GCM, whose default according to ASN.1 encoding (12 bytes) can lead to vulnerabilities. After careful consideration, it was decided that the insecure default value of 12 bytes was a default only for the encoding and not default anywhere else in Android, and hence no vulnerability existed.
Published 2016-04-18 · Modified
5.5EPSS 0.004
CVE-2016-1000339
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the primary engine class used for AES was AESFastEngine. Due to the highly table driven approach used in the algorithm it turns out that if the data channel on the CPU can be monitored the lookup table accesses are sufficient to leak information on the AES key being used. There was also a leak in AESEngine although it was substantially less. AESEngine has been modified to remove any signs of leakage (testing carried out on Intel X86-64) and is now the primary AES class for the BC JCE provider from 1.56. Use of AESFastEngine is now only recommended where otherwise deemed appropriate.
Published 2018-06-04 · Modified
5.3EPSS 0.027
CVE-2023-33201
Bouncy Castle For Java before 1.74 is affected by an LDAP injection vulnerability. The vulnerability only affects applications that use an LDAP CertStore from Bouncy Castle to validate X.509 certificates. During the certificate validation process, Bouncy Castle inserts the certificate's Subject Name into an LDAP search filter without any escaping, which leads to an LDAP injection vulnerability.
Published 2023-07-05 · Modified
5.3EPSS 0.008
CVE-2026-58063
BCFKS keystore load honours unbounded KDF cost from untrusted file
Published 2026-08-03 · Analyzed
5.3EPSS 0.004
CVE-2018-5382
Bouncy Castle BKS-V1 keystore files vulnerable to trivial hash collisions
Published 2018-04-16 · Modified
4.4EPSS 0.003
CVE-2016-1000346
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the other party DH public key is not fully validated. This can cause issues as invalid keys can be used to reveal details about the other party's private key where static Diffie-Hellman is in use. As of release 1.56 the key parameters are checked on agreement calculation.
Published 2018-06-04 · Modified
4.3EPSS 0.023
CVE-2013-1624
The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.
Published 2013-02-08 · Modified
4.0EPSS 0.030
← Prev2 / 2