VendorsGoogleandroid16.0
Vulnerabilities

Google Android 16.0

Ranked by severity, then by exploit likelihood. Click a CVE ID for its full record.

366CVEs
CVE-2025-48589
In multiple functions of HeaderPrivacyIconsController.kt, there is a possible way to grand permissions across user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48654
In onStart of CompanionDeviceManagerService.java, there is a possible confused deputy due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-03-02 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-20411
In cameraisp, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to use after free. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10351676; Issue ID: MSV-5737.
Published 2026-02-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-20412
In cameraisp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10351676; Issue ID: MSV-5733.
Published 2026-02-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48540
In processTransactInternal of RpcState.cpp, there is a possible local out of memory write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28593
In getItemList of SettingsFragment.java, there is a possible user interaction bypass due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-49932
In parseParts of PduParser.java, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28580
In multiple functions, there is a possible desync in persistence due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-55294
In ihevcd_get_tu_data_size of ihevcd_utils.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-49918
In multiple functions, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-58820
In multiple locations, there is a possible memory safety issue due to integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges required.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-58839
In forEachLine of MountRegistry.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28653
In multiple functions of rw_t3t.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-49884
In rw_mfc_handle_read_op of rw_mfc.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-49927
In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-45531
In read_boot_region of fsck.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-45515
In a2dp_vendor_opus_decoder_decode_packet of a2dp_vendor_opus_decoder.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48620
In onSomePackagesChanged of VoiceInteractionManagerService.java, there is a possible way for a third party application's component name to persist even after uninstalling due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48583
In multiple functions of BaseBundle.java, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32349
In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20705
In monitor_hang, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09989078; Issue ID: MSV-3964.
Published 2025-09-01 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48646
In executeRequest of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible launch anywhere due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-03-02 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32323
In getCallingAppName of Shared.java, there is a possible way to trick users into granting file access via deceptive text in a permission popup due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48596
In appendFrom of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32324
In onCommand of ActivityManagerShellCommand.java, there is a possible arbitrary activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48553
In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible DoS of a device admin due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20721
In imgsensor, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10089545; Issue ID: MSV-4279.
Published 2025-10-14 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48546
In checkPermissions of SafeActivityOptions.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28602
In setClipboardAccessNotificationsEnabledForUser of ClipboardService.java, there is a possible mult-iuser isolation due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32345
In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48523
In onCreate of SelectAccountActivity.java, there is a possible way to add contacts without permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48594
In onUidImportance of DisassociationProcessor.java, there is a possible way to retain companion application privileges after disassociation due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48606
In preparePackage of InstallPackageHelper.java, there is a possible way for an app to appear hidden upon installation without a mechanism to uninstall it due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20780
In display, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10184061; Issue ID: MSV-4712.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28636
In setupLayout of PickActivity.java, there is a possible bypass of the "Install unknown apps" security restriction due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28614
In onCreate of SlicePermissionActivity.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28620
In multiple locations, there is a possible unauthorized URI access due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28631
In buildMiniResolver of IntentForwarderActivity.java, there is a possible consent bypass due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28607
In multiple functions in multiple locations, there is a possible background activity launch bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28644
In startNextMatchingActivity of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
← Prev3 / 10Next →