VendorsGoogleandroid15.0
Vulnerabilities

Google Android 15.0

Ranked by severity, then by exploit likelihood. Click a CVE ID for its full record.

530CVEs
CVE-2025-20706
In mbrain, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09924624; Issue ID: MSV-3826.
Published 2025-09-01 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48646
In executeRequest of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible launch anywhere due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-03-02 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-0080
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to overlay the installation confirmation dialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-08-26 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48596
In appendFrom of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48588
In startAlwaysOnVpn of Vpn.java, there is a possible way to disable always-on VPN due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26454
In validateUriSchemeAndPermission of DisclaimersParserImpl.java , there is a possible way to access data from another user due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20721
In imgsensor, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10089545; Issue ID: MSV-4279.
Published 2025-10-14 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20723
In gnss driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09920033; Issue ID: MSV-3797.
Published 2025-10-14 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32349
In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28639
In rw_mfc_handle_read_op of rw_mfc.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32323
In getCallingAppName of Shared.java, there is a possible way to trick users into granting file access via deceptive text in a permission popup due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48594
In onUidImportance of DisassociationProcessor.java, there is a possible way to retain companion application privileges after disassociation due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48553
In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible DoS of a device admin due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32324
In onCommand of ActivityManagerShellCommand.java, there is a possible arbitrary activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-22434
In handleKeyGestureEvent of PhoneWindowManager.java, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20780
In display, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10184061; Issue ID: MSV-4712.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26458
In multiple functions of LocationProviderManager.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48546
In checkPermissions of SafeActivityOptions.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-22424
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to reveal images across users due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48523
In onCreate of SelectAccountActivity.java, there is a possible way to add contacts without permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-45520
In onAttach of BiometricsSettingsBase.java, there is a possible authentication bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48573
In sendCommand of MediaSessionRecord.java, there is a possible way to launch the foreground service while the app is in the background due to FGS while-in-use abuse. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32345
In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48586
In onActivityResult of EditFdnContactScreen.java, there is a possible way to leak contacts from the work profile due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20798
In battery, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10315812; Issue ID: MSV-5533.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-0009
In multiple locations, there is a possible tapjacking due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20797
In battery, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10315812; Issue ID: MSV-5534.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26436
In clearAllowBgActivityStarts of PendingIntentRecord.java, there is a possible way for an application to launch an activity from the background due to BAL Bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20645
In KeyInstall, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09475476; Issue ID: MSV-2599.
Published 2025-03-03 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48541
In onCreate of FaceSettings.java, there is a possible way to remove biometric unlock across user profiles due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48536
In grantAllowlistedPackagePermissions of SettingsSliceProvider.java, there is a possible way for a third party app to modify secure settings due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20768
In display, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10196993; Issue ID: MSV-4805.
Published 2025-12-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48563
In onNullBinding of RemoteFillService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48555
In multiple functions of NotificationStation.java, there is a possible cross-profile information disclosure due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20668
In scp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09625562; Issue ID: MSV-3027.
Published 2025-05-05 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32321
In isSafeIntent of AccountTypePreferenceLoader.java, there is a possible way to bypass an intent type check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-43095
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to obtain any system permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-01-21 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32326
In multiple functions of AppRestrictionsFragment.java, there is a possible way to bypass intent security check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-22426
In many functions of ComputerEngine.java, there is a possible way to access URIs across users due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20778
In display, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10184870; Issue ID: MSV-4729.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
← Prev4 / 14Next →