VendorsGoogleandroid15.0
Vulnerabilities

Google Android 15.0

Ranked by severity, then by exploit likelihood, unless you sort otherwise. Click a CVE ID for its full record.

596CVEs
CVE-2026-58886
In updateInputWindows of InputMonitor.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-11-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28650
In setHiddenWhileSuspended of WindowState.java, there is a possible overlay bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48589
In multiple functions of HeaderPrivacyIconsController.kt, there is a possible way to grand permissions across user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28658
In findMetaAuthUid of AccountsDb.java, there is a possible frp bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28639
In rw_mfc_handle_read_op of rw_mfc.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-22422
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to mislead a user into approving an authentication prompt for one app when its result will be used in another due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-20409
In imgsys, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10363246; Issue ID: MSV-5779.
Published 2026-02-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28642
In executeRequest of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28634
In handleUssdRequest of PhoneInterfaceManager.java, there is a possible way to send a USSD request without permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28668
In LimitRealloc of malloc_limit.cpp, there is a possible use after free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28583
In validate_camera_metadata_structure of camera_metadata.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a logical error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28664
In WriteImageToDisk of runtime_image.cc, there is a possible file tampering due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-20412
In cameraisp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10351676; Issue ID: MSV-5733.
Published 2026-02-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-20411
In cameraisp, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to use after free. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10351676; Issue ID: MSV-5737.
Published 2026-02-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-0065
In areBackgroundActivityStartsAllowed of BackgroundLaunchProcessController.java, there is a possible unintended way to launch activities in the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48544
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to read files belonging to other apps due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48540
In processTransactInternal of RpcState.cpp, there is a possible local out of memory write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48531
In getCallingPackageName of CredentialStorage, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-58925
The report details a heap Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability within the `android.hardware.automotive.evs-default` HAL service, stemming from unsynchronized access to an `std::unordered_map`. An unprivileged application with access to the EVS manager can trigger this UAF by making concurrent calls to `setExtendedInfo` and `getExtendedInfo`, potentially enabling code execution within the privileged HAL process.
Published 2026-11-02 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32331
In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48522
In setDisplayName of AssociationRequest.java, there is a possible way for an app to retain CDM association due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48620
In onSomePackagesChanged of VoiceInteractionManagerService.java, there is a possible way for a third party application's component name to persist even after uninstalling due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32328
In multiple functions of Session.java, there is a possible way to view images belonging to a different user of the device due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32329
In multiple functions of Session.java, there is a possible way to view images belonging to a different user of the device due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-49919
In tt_face_colr_blend_layer of ttcolr.c, there is a possible remote code execution due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-0079
In multiple locations, there is a possible way that avdtp and avctp channels could be unencrypted due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-08-26 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26464
In executeAppFunction of AppSearchManagerService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-22433
In canForward of IntentForwarderActivity.java, there is a possible bypass of the cross profile intent filter most commonly used in Work Profile scenarios due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32349
In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26454
In validateUriSchemeAndPermission of DisclaimersParserImpl.java , there is a possible way to access data from another user due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-49720
In multiple functions of Permissions.java, there is a possible way to override the state of the user's location permissions due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28593
In getItemList of SettingsFragment.java, there is a possible user interaction bypass due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48596
In appendFrom of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32312
In createIntentsList of PackageParser.java , there is a possible way to bypass lazy bundle hardening, allowing modified data to be passed to the next process due to unsafe deserialization. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-49884
In rw_mfc_handle_read_op of rw_mfc.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-55294
In ihevcd_get_tu_data_size of ihevcd_utils.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-49932
In parseParts of PduParser.java, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-45531
In read_boot_region of fsck.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-45515
In a2dp_vendor_opus_decoder_decode_packet of a2dp_vendor_opus_decoder.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28653
In multiple functions of rw_t3t.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
← Prev4 / 15Next →