VendorsGoogleandroid15.0
Vulnerabilities

Google Android 15.0

Ranked by severity, then by exploit likelihood, unless you sort otherwise. Click a CVE ID for its full record.

596CVEs
CVE-2026-28600
In onCreate of PaymentDefaultDialog.java, there is a possible way to change default payment app due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-28603
In assertSafeToStartCustomActivity of AppRestrictionsFragment.java, there is a possible read/write access to private files due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-09-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48541
In onCreate of FaceSettings.java, there is a possible way to remove biometric unlock across user profiles due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-0009
In multiple locations, there is a possible tapjacking due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32321
In isSafeIntent of AccountTypePreferenceLoader.java, there is a possible way to bypass an intent type check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32326
In multiple functions of AppRestrictionsFragment.java, there is a possible way to bypass intent security check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20778
In display, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10184870; Issue ID: MSV-4729.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32347
In onStart of BiometricEnrollIntroduction.java, there is a possible way to determine the device's location due to an unsafe PendingIntent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48632
In setDisplayName of AssociationRequest.java, there is a possible way to cause CDM associations to persist after the user has disassociated them due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48629
In findAvailRecognizer of VoiceInteractionManagerService.java, there is a possible way to become the default speech recognizer app due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-32350
In maybeShowDialog of ControlsSettingsDialogManager.kt, there is a possible overlay of the ControlsSettingsDialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48628
In validateIconUserBoundary of PrintManagerService.java, there is a possible cross-user image leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48597
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-43095
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to obtain any system permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-01-21 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-22420
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to leak audio files across user profiles due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-12-08 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-22426
In many functions of ComputerEngine.java, there is a possible way to access URIs across users due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26462
In AccessibilityServiceConnection.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20668
In scp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09625562; Issue ID: MSV-3027.
Published 2025-05-05 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26430
In getDestinationForApp of SpaAppBridgeActivity, there is a possible cross-user file reveal due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26435
In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20763
In mmdvfs, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10267218; Issue ID: MSV-5032.
Published 2025-12-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20764
In smi, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10259774; Issue ID: MSV-5029.
Published 2025-12-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20766
In display, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10196993; Issue ID: MSV-4820.
Published 2025-12-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20767
In display, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10196993; Issue ID: MSV-4807.
Published 2025-12-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48652
In performPreInstallChecks of InstallRepository.kt, there is a possible way to bypass MDM policy due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-0045
In bta_jv_rfcomm_connect of bta_jv_act.cc, there is a possible bypass of bonding for a secure connection due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-22428
In hasInteractAcrossUsersFullPermission of AppInfoBase.java, there is a possible way to grant permissions to an app on the secondary user from the primary user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2026-0087
In approvalLevelForDomainInternal of DomainVerificationService.java, there is a possible way to hijack an arbitrary app link due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-43769
In isPackageDeviceAdmin of PackageManagerService.java, there is a possible edge case which could prevent the uninstallation of CloudDpc due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-01-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20781
In display, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10182914; Issue ID: MSV-4699.
Published 2026-01-06 · Modified
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20796
In imgsys, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10314745; Issue ID: MSV-5553.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20799
In c2ps, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10274607; Issue ID: MSV-5049.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-20800
In mminfra, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10267349; Issue ID: MSV-5033.
Published 2026-01-06 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48558
In multiple functions of BatteryService.java, there is a possible way to hijack implicit intent intended for system app due to Implicit intent hijacking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26450
In onInputEvent of IInputMethodSessionWrapper.java, there is a possible way for an untrusted app to inject key and motion events to the default IME due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-26452
In loadDrawableForCookie of ResourcesImpl.java, there is a possible way to access task snapshots of other apps due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-04 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-49738
In writeInplace of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-01-21 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-48649
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to reset user-selected permissions selections due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2026-06-01 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2024-49745
In growData of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-01-21 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
CVE-2025-22416
In onCreate of ChooserActivity.java , there is a possible way to view other users' images due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Published 2025-09-02 · Analyzed
7.8EPSS 0.001
← Prev6 / 15Next →