VendorsApachetomcat10.0.0
Vulnerabilities

Apache Tomcat 10.0.0

Ranked by severity, then by exploit likelihood. Click a CVE ID for its full record.

12CVEs
CVE-2020-13935
The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service.
Published 2020-07-14 · Modified
7.5EPSS 0.866
CVE-2020-13934
An h2c direct connection to Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M5 to 9.0.36 and 8.5.1 to 8.5.56 did not release the HTTP/1.1 processor after the upgrade to HTTP/2. If a sufficient number of such requests were made, an OutOfMemoryException could occur leading to a denial of service.
Published 2020-07-14 · Modified
7.5EPSS 0.641
CVE-2020-11996
A specially crafted sequence of HTTP/2 requests sent to Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M5, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.35 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.55 could trigger high CPU usage for several seconds. If a sufficient number of such requests were made on concurrent HTTP/2 connections, the server could become unresponsive.
Published 2020-06-26 · Modified
7.5EPSS 0.267
CVE-2020-17527
Apache Tomcat: Request header mix-up between HTTP/2 streams
Published 2020-12-03 · Modified
7.5EPSS 0.246
CVE-2021-25122
Apache Tomcat h2c request mix-up
Published 2021-03-01 · Modified
7.5EPSS 0.181
CVE-2021-42340
DoS via memory leak with WebSocket connections
Published 2021-10-14 · Modified
7.5EPSS 0.118
CVE-2020-9484
When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.
Published 2020-05-20 · Modified
7.0EPSS 0.555
CVE-2021-25329
Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484
Published 2021-03-01 · Modified
7.0EPSS 0.095
CVE-2022-23181
Local privilege escalation with FileStore
Published 2022-01-27 · Modified
7.0EPSS 0.007
CVE-2026-24733
Apache Tomcat: Security constraint bypass with HTTP/0.9
Published 2026-02-17 · Modified
6.5EPSS 0.005
CVE-2021-24122
Apache Tomcat information disclosure
Published 2021-01-14 · Modified
5.9EPSS 0.229
CVE-2020-13943
If an HTTP/2 client connecting to Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M7, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.37 or 8.5.0 to 8.5.57 exceeded the agreed maximum number of concurrent streams for a connection (in violation of the HTTP/2 protocol), it was possible that a subsequent request made on that connection could contain HTTP headers - including HTTP/2 pseudo headers - from a previous request rather than the intended headers. This could lead to users seeing responses for unexpected resources.
Published 2020-10-12 · Modified
4.3EPSS 0.573