Trend Micro Serverprotect

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58 before Security Patch 2 Build 1174 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted data to (1) TCP port 5168, which triggers an overflow in the CAgRpcClient::CreateBinding function in the AgRpcCln.dll library in SpntSvc.exe; or (2) TCP port 3628, which triggers an overflow in EarthAgent.exe. NOTE: both issues are reachable via TmRpcSrv.dll.

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Windows and EMC 5.58, and for Network Appliance Filer 5.61 and 5.62, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted RPC requests to TmRpcSrv.dll that trigger overflows when calling the (1) CMON_NetTestConnection, (2) CMON_ActiveUpdate, and (3) CMON_ActiveRollback functions in (a) StCommon.dll, and (4) ENG_SetRealTimeScanConfigInfo and (5) ENG_SendEMail functions in (b) eng50.dll.

SpntSvc.exe daemon in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58 for Windows, before Security Patch 4, exposes unspecified dangerous sub-functions from StRpcSrv.dll in the DCE/RPC interface, which allows remote attackers to obtain "full file system access" and execute arbitrary code.

Multiple buffer overflows in the ServerProtect service (SpntSvc.exe) in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Windows before 5.58 Security Patch 4 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain RPC requests to certain TCP ports that are processed by the (1) RPCFN_ENG_NewManualScan, (2) RPCFN_ENG_TimedNewManualScan, and (3) RPCFN_SetComputerName functions in (a) StRpcSrv.dll; the (4) RPCFN_CMON_SetSvcImpersonateUser and (5) RPCFN_OldCMON_SetSvcImpersonateUser functions in (b) Stcommon.dll; the (6) RPCFN_ENG_TakeActionOnAFile and (7) RPCFN_ENG_AddTaskExportLogItem functions in (c) Eng50.dll; the (8) NTF_SetPagerNotifyConfig function in (d) Notification.dll; or the (9) RPCFN_CopyAUSrc function in the (e) ServerProtect Agent service.

Integer overflow in the RPCFN_SYNC_TASK function in StRpcSrv.dll, as used by the ServerProtect service (SpntSvc.exe), in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Windows before 5.58 Security Patch 4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a certain integer field in a request packet to TCP port 5168, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.

Stack-based buffer overflow in the TMregChange function in TMReg.dll in Trend Micro ServerProtect before 5.58 Security Patch 4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet to TCP port 5005.

Heap-based buffer overflow in an unspecified procedure in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, possibly related to a folder read operation over RPC.

Heap-based buffer overflow in an unspecified procedure in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, possibly related to a file read operation over RPC.

Heap-based buffer overflow in an unspecified procedure in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, probably related to an RPC interface.

Heap-based buffer overflow in an unspecified procedure in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, possibly related to a read operation over RPC.

Unspecified vulnerability in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to obtaining "administrative access to the RPC interface."

Heap-based buffer overflow in an unspecified procedure in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, possibly related to the product's configuration, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-0012 and CVE-2008-0013.

Heap-based buffer overflow in an unspecified procedure in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, possibly related to the product's configuration, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-0013 and CVE-2008-0014.

Heap-based buffer overflow in an unspecified procedure in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, possibly related to the product's configuration, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-0012 and CVE-2008-0014.

Multiple buffer overflows in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58 before Security Patch 2- Build 1174 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted RPC message processed by the (1) the RPCFN_ActiveRollback function in (a) stcommon.dll, or the (2) ENG_SetRealTimeScanConfigInfo or (3) ENG_SendEmail functions in (b) eng50.dll.

Buffer overflow in AgRpcCln.dll for Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58 for Windows before Security Patch 3 Build 1176 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors related to RPC requests. NOTE: this is probably a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-2508.

Multiple buffer overflows in EarthAgent.exe in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58 for Windows before Security Patch 4 allow remote attackers to have an unknown impact via certain RPC function calls to (1) RPCFN_EVENTBACK_DoHotFix or (2) CMD_CHANGE_AGENT_REGISTER_INFO.

Buffer overflow in the Trend Micro Scan Engine 8.000 and 8.300 before virus pattern file 4.245.00, as used in other products such as Cyber Clean Center (CCC) Cleaner, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed UPX compressed executable.

The Trend Micro scan engine before 8.320 for Windows and before 8.150 on HP-UX and AIX, as used in Trend Micro PC Cillin - Internet Security 2006, Office Scan 7.3, and Server Protect 5.58, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption and system hang) via a malformed RAR archive with an Archive Header section with the head_size and pack_size fields set to zero, which triggers an infinite loop.

Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in (1) isaNVWRequest.dll and (2) relay.dll in Trend Micro ServerProtect Management Console 5.58 and earlier, as used in Control Manager 2.5 and 3.0 and Damage Cleanup Server 1.1, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via "wrapped" length values in Chunked transfer requests. NOTE: the original report suggests that the relay.dll issue is related to a problem in which a Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC) static library returns invalid values under heavy load. As such, this might not be a vulnerability in Trend Micro's product.

Heap-based buffer overflow in Trend Micro AntiVirus Library VSAPI before 7.510, as used in multiple Trend Micro products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ARJ file with long header file names that modify pointers within a structure.

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux (SPLX) 1.25, 1.3, and 2.5 before 20070216 allows remote attackers to access arbitrary web pages and reconfigure the product via HTTP requests with the splx_2376_info cookie to the web interface port (14942/tcp).

Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58, and possibly InterScan Messaging Security Suite and InterScan Web Security Suite, have a default configuration setting of "Do not scan compressed files when Extracted file count exceeds 500 files," which may be too low in certain circumstances, which allows remote attackers to bypass anti-virus checks by sending compressed archives containing many small files. NOTE: since this is related to a configuration setting that has an operational impact that might vary depending on the environment, and the product is claimed to report a message when the compressed file exceeds specified limits, perhaps this should not be included in CVE.

Directory traversal vulnerability in the Crystal Report component (rptserver.asp) in Trend Micro ServerProtect Management Console 5.58, as used in Control Manager 2.5 and 3.0 and Damage Cleanup Server 1.1, and possibly earlier versions, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the IMAGE parameter.

The web interface in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux (SPLX) 1.25, 1.3, and 2.5 before 20070216 accepts logon requests through unencrypted HTTP, which might allow remote attackers to obtain credentials by sniffing the network.